ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIK: PELUANG DAN TANTANGAN GASTRONOMI ANALOG DAGING DI ERA PASCAPANDEMI

Dodik Prakoso Eko Hery Suwandojo; Sony Heru Priyanto; Sugiarto Sugiarto; Rizky Maulana

Authors

Dodik Prakoso Eko Hery Suwandojo Sekolah Tinggi Pariwisata Ambarrukmo Yogyakarta Jalan Ringroad Timur No. 52, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55198.
Sony Heru Priyanto Sekolah Tinggi Pariwisata Ambarrukmo Yogyakarta Jalan Ringroad Timur No. 52, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55198.
Sugiarto Sugiarto Sekolah Tinggi Pariwisata Ambarrukmo Yogyakarta Jalan Ringroad Timur No. 52, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55198.
Rizky Maulana Sekolah Tinggi Pariwisata Ambarrukmo Yogyakarta

Keywords:

Analog Daging, Bibliometrik,, Gastronomi, Pascapandemi

Abstract

Pandemi COVID-19 telah mengubah lanskap industri pangan global, termasuk sektor daging. Analog daging, sebagai sumber pangan alternatif berkelanjutan, mengalami lonjakan permintaan. Artikel ini menyajikan tinjauan literatur komprehensif mengenai peluang dan tantangan analog daging pascapandemi, menggunakan pendekatan bibliometrik berbasis Google Scholar. Analisis dilakukan dengan bantuan perangkat lunak Publish or Perish dan VOSviewer untuk memvisualisasikan tren penelitian dan mengidentifikasi area fokus utama. Hasil analisis menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan dalam penelitian tentang analog daging pascapandemi, dengan fokus pada aspek keberlanjutan, kesehatan, inovasi teknologi, dan penerimaan konsumen terhadap analog daging.

References

Bohrer, B. M. (2019). An investigation of the formulation and nutritional composition of modern meat analogue products. Food Science and Human Wellness, 8(4), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2019.11.006

Breure, T. (2023). Beef to Bean: An Analysis of the Environmental Benefits of Replacing Beef with Bean Dishes in K-12 Schools. search.proquest.com. https://search.proquest.com/openview/5b4e24db32a945cc140abda4d5d9ed54/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Bryant, C., & Barnett, J. (2018). Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: A systematic review. Meat Science, 143, 8–17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309174017314602

Bryant, C., & Barnett, J. (2020). Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat: An Updated Review (2018–2020). Applied Sciences, 10(15), 5201. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155201

De-Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., Muñoz-Fernández, F. J., Navarrete-Cortés, J., & SCImago, G. (2004). Indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica española:(ISI, Web of science, 1998-2002). FECYT-Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Spain.

Derbyshire, E. J. (2017). Flexitarian Diets and Health: A Review of the Evidence-Based Literature. Frontiers in Nutrition, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2016.00055

Devos, P. (2011). Research and bibliometrics: A long history…. Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology, 35(5), 336–337. https://europepmc.org/article/med/21621176

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321003155

Fraser, G. E. (2009). Vegetarian diets: What do we know of their effects on common chronic diseases? The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(5), 1607S-1612S. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736K

Fu, J., Sun, C., Chang, Y., Li, S., Zhang, Y., & Fang, Y. (2023). Structure analysis and quality evaluation of plant‐based meat analogs. Journal of Texture Studies, 54(3), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12705

Hadi, J., & Brightwell, G. (2021). Safety of Alternative Proteins: Technological, Environmental and Regulatory Aspects of Cultured Meat, Plant-Based Meat, Insect Protein and Single-Cell Protein. Foods, 10(6), 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061226

Hanifah, S., Abdillah, T. D. F., & Wachyudi, K. (2022). Analisis bibliometrik dalam mencari research gap menggunakan aplikasi vosviewer dan aplikasi publish or perish. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 2(7), 2713–2728. https://www.bajangjournal.com/index.php/JIRK/article/view/4082

Kotler, P. (2002). Marketing places. Simon and Schuster. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=0lwKEZc9gjsC&oi=fnd&pg=PT6&dq=Kotler,+Philip.+1980.+Marketing+Management.+Englewood+Cliffs,+N.J.:+Prentice-Hall,+Fourth+Edition.&ots=LO1FUbG-GF&sig=DDkZHAVB8ggS_YndS7E-6Budelw

Kumar, P., Sharma, N., Sharma, S., Mehta, N., Verma, A. K., Chemmalar, S., & Sazili, A. Q. (2021). In-vitro meat: A promising solution for sustainability of meat sector. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 63(4), 693–724. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e85

Laestadius, L. I. (2015). Public Perceptions of the Ethics of In-vitro Meat: Determining an Appropriate Course of Action. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28(5), 991–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9573-8

Meadows, D. H., Club of Rome, & Potomac Associates (Eds.). (1974). The Limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind (2d ed). Universe Books.

O’Mara, F. P. (2011). The significance of livestock as a contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions today and in the near future. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166, 7–15.

Post, M. J., Levenberg, S., Kaplan, D. L., Genovese, N., Fu, J., Bryant, C. J., Negowetti, N., Verzijden, K., & Moutsatsou, P. (2020). Scientific, sustainability and regulatory challenges of cultured meat. Nature Food, 1(7), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0112-z

Riyanto, B., Syafitri, U. D., Santoso, J., & Yasmin, E. F. (2022). Karakteristik Daging Tiruan (Meat Analog) dengan Optimasi Formulasi Substitusi Rumput Laut menggunakan Mixture Design: Characteristics of Meat Analog with Formula Optimization of Seaweed Substitution using Mixture Design. Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia, 25(2), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.17844/jphpi.v25i2.39942

Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 432–448). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203887011-36/diffusion-innovations-everett-rogers-arvind-singhal-margaret-quinlan

Sanchez-Sabate, R., & Sabaté, J. (2019). Consumer Attitudes Towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Consumption: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(7), 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071220

Singh, M., Trivedi, N., Enamala, M. K., Kuppam, C., Parikh, P., Nikolova, M. P., & Chavali, M. (2021). Plant-based meat analogue (PBMA) as a sustainable food: A concise review. European Food Research and Technology, 247(10), 2499–2526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-021-03810-1

Tuomisto, H. L., & Teixeira De Mattos, M. J. (2011). Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(14), 6117–6123. https://doi.org/10.1021/es200130u

Verbeke, W., Marcu, A., Rutsaert, P., Gaspar, R., Seibt, B., Fletcher, D., & Barnett, J. (2015). ‘Would you eat cultured meat?’: Consumers’ reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Meat Science, 102, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.013

Zhang, J., Chen, Q., Kaplan, D. L., & Wang, Q. (2022). High-moisture extruded protein fiber formation toward plant-based meat substitutes applications: Science, technology, and prospect. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 128, 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2022.08.008