STRATEGIC PERSUASION: SECURING COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

Gede Aldi Legawa Putra; Leila Mona Ganiem

Authors

Gede Aldi Legawa Putra Mercu Buana University
Leila Mona Ganiem Mercu Buana University

Keywords:

Community, Infrastructure Development, Internet Service Provider, Persuasive Communication, PT Linknet Tbk

Abstract

The development of internet infrastructure is crucial for fostering economic and social progress in the digital age. However, obtaining approval from local communities for such projects can be challenging due to concerns about environmental impact and disruptions. This study analyzes the persuasive communication strategies employed by PT Linknet Tbk (First Media), an Internet Service Provider (ISP), to secure permits for infrastructure development. Using a qualitative case study approach, the research explores how different persuasive techniques were applied to engage communities and reduce resistance. Key strategies include the association technique, where the project is linked to long-term community benefits such as enhanced internet access; the integration technique, involving community participation and addressing concerns; the reward/pay-off technique, offering incentives; and the red herring technique, shifting focus from temporary disruptions to long-term gains. The findings show that these strategies effectively increased community support, streamlined the permit process, and minimized potential conflicts. The study concludes that persuasive communication is vital in building positive community relations and ensuring the successful implementation of infrastructure projects, particularly in regions where community approval is essential.

References

Adăscăliţei, Andra-Mirabela. 2022. “The Experimental Approach of Conflict Resolution (Implications for the School Environment).” Univers Pedagogic. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:255335943.

Argenti, Paul A. 2014. Corporate Communication. McGraw-Hill Education. McGraw-Hill.

Boritz, J Efrim. 1985. “The Effect of Information Presentation Structures on Audit Planning and Review Judgments.” Contemporary Accounting Research 1: 193–218. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:155024766.

Burgon & Huffner. 2002. Human Communication. London: Sage Publication.

Chatra, Emeraldy, Ilham Havifi, and Diego Yenmis. 2019. “Dynamics of Contractor-Public Communication: A Phenomenological Study of Communication in the Implementation of Infrastructure Projects in West Sumatra (Original Title in Indonesian).” Jurnal Ranah Komunikasi (JRK) 3, no. 2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25077/rk.3.2.90-101.2019.

Erisanti, Lita, and Diana Amalia. 2023. “Implementasi Community Relations Sebagai Strategi CSR PT Petrokimia Gresik.” NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial 10, no. 2: 561–71. https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v10i2.2023.561-571.

Ganiem, Leila Mona, and Eddy Kurnia. 2019. Komunikasi Korporat: Konteks Teoretis Dan Praktis. Prenadamedia Group.

Gold, Stefan, Judy N Muthuri, and Gerald Reiner. 2017. “Collective Action for Tackling ‘Wicked’ Social Problems: A System Dynamics Model for Corporate Community Involvement.” Journal of Cleaner Production 179: 662–73. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:59441321.

Gouldner, Alvin W. 1960. “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement.” American Sociological Review 25, no. 2: 161–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623.

Jakubelskas, Ugnius. 2021. “Evaluation of Key Factor of Digital Economy in European Union.” Economics and Culture 18: 41–50. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:245616934.

Kern, Florian G. 2018. “The Trials and Tribulations of Applied Triangulation: Weighing Different Data Sources.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 12: 166–81. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55817476.

Mirawati, Ira. 2021. “Utilization of Persuasive Communication Theory in E-Commerce Research in the Digital Era (Original Title in Indonesian).” Medium (Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Islam Riau) 12, no. 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25299/medium.2021.vol9(1).7443.

Oschatz, Corinna, and Caroline Marker. 2020. “Long-Term Persuasive Effects in Narrative Communication Research: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Communication 70: 473–96. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:225450491.

Strover, Sharon, Gary Chapman, and Jody Waters. 2004. “Beyond Community Networking and CTCs: Access, Development, and Public Policy.” Telecommunications Policy 28: 465–85. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:153549834.

Sweller, John. 1988. “Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on Learning.” Cognitive Science 12, no. 2: 257–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7.

Taufik, Taufik, Nanik Handayani, Nurwahidah Amir, Harziko Harziko, and Andi Irmawati. 2021. “Peningkatan Minat Siswa Di Kabupaten Buru Untuk Melanjutkan Studi: Strategi Persuasif.” In . https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:233830814.

Tongco, Ma. Dolores C. 2007. “Purposive Sampling as a Tool for Informant Selection.” Ethnobotany Research and Applications 5: 147–58. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:166413790.

Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211, no. 4481: 453–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683.

Zinko, Roman. 2015. “Structuring of Information Base for Designing Fire Equipment.” Safety of Technogenic Environment 6: 47–51. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55682777.