TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS TERKAIT MINUTA AKTA YANG HILANG DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG JABATAN NOTARIS

Authors

  • Wiwin Nurwianti Program Pascasarjana Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jayabaya Jakarta
  • Rielly Lontoh Program Pascasarjana Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jayabaya Jakarta
  • Amelia Nur Widyanti Program Pascasarjana Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jayabaya Jakarta

Keywords:

Minutes of Deed, Legal Consequences, Responsibility

Abstract

The position of the minutes of the deed is very important so that the notary must be careful in storing it so that it is not damaged, lost and/or scattered. Negligence in storing the minutes of the deed results in the injured parties being able to sue the Notary for administrative, civil or criminal liability. The problems studied in this thesis are First, the legal consequences related to the lost minutes of the deed Second, the legal responsibility of the notary related to the lost minutes of the deed. The theories used to analyze these problems are the theory of legal consequences by R. Soeroso and the theory of responsibility by Hans Kelsen.
The method used in this research is normative juridical research, namely library legal research or secondary data with primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. The research approach used is a statutory approach, conceptual approach, analytical approach, and case approach and the technique of collecting legal materials is carried out by identifying and inventorying positive legal rules, book literature, journals and other legal sources. For legal material analysis techniques carried out by grammatical and systematic legal interpretation while legal construction methods by analogy and legal refinement.
From the results of the research, it can be concluded that the legal consequences for Notaries who are negligent in keeping the minutes of the deeds they make have juridical implications can be sued by the parties to compensate for losses, if the parties are harmed by the Notary concerned. The responsibility carried out by the notary due to damage or loss that occurs to the minutes of the deed that is lost or damaged due to the fault or negligence of the notary himself, the notary concerned will be held accountable in the form of making a report to the police for loss and damage, sending a report to the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia regarding the condition of loss or damage and then waiting for follow-up settlement and if possible, the Notary can request an application from the Panel of Judges at the District Court to obtain approval for making a new copy of the deed.

References

Chiska Claudia Putri, “Penyimpanan Protokol Notaris Secara Elektronik Dalam Konsep Cyber Notary”, Tesis, Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, 2019.

Cut Era Fitriyani, “The Responsibility of Notary Towards Keeping The Minutes of Legal Documentary as a Part of Notary Protocol”. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Nomor 58 Tahun XIV Desember, 2012.

Desy Rositawaty, “Penyimpanan Protokol Notaris Secara Elektronik dalam Kaitan Cyber Notary”, Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Magister Kenotariatan, e-ISSN: 2502-7573, 2017-2018.

Fence M Wantu, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Reviva Cendekia, Gorontalo, 2015.

G.H.S. Lumban Tobing, Peraturan Jabatan Notaris, Cetakan 3, Erlangga, Jakarta, 2018.

Hans Kelsen, sebagaimana diterjemahkan oleh Raisul Mutaqien, Teori Hukum Murni Nuansa & Nusa Media, Bandung, 2006.

Herlien Budiono, Demikian Akta Ini: Tanya Jawab Akta Notaris di Dalam Praktek, Citra Aditya Bakti Bandung, 2015.

Jazim Hamidi, Revolusi Hukum Indonesia: Makna, Kedudukan, dan ImplikasiHukum Naskah Proklamasi 17 Agustus 1945 dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan RI, Konstitusi Press & Citra Media, Yogyakarta, 2006.

Jimly Asshiddiqie dan M Ali Safa’at, Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum, Konstitusi Press, Jakarta Pusat, 2016.

Machsun Rifauddin, “Pengelolaan Arsip Elektronik Berbasis Teknologi”, Jurnal Khizanah Al-Hikmah, No. 2 Vol. 4, Juli-Desember, 2016.

Marwan Mas, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor, 2003.

Nomensen Sinomo, Filsafat Hukum, Dilengkapi dengan Materi Etika Profesi Hukum, PT Permata Aksara, Jakarta, 2017.

R. Soeroso, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Sinar Grafika Jakarta, 2011.

R.N.H. Simanjuntak, Hukum Perdata Indonesia, Kencana, Jakarta, 2017.

Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2006.

Sjaifurrachman dan Habib Adjie, Apek Pertanggung Jawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2011.

Soedjono Dirdjosisworo, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Tinggi, jakarta, 2010.

Supriadi, Etika Dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum di Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2016.

Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Berserta Amandemennya.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgelijk Wetbooek).

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.

Undang-Undang Nomor 43 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kearsipan.

Kode Etik Notaris, Berita Negara Republik Indonesia tanggal 7 April 1995 No. 28 Tambahan Nomor 1/P-1995

Putusan

Kasus Perkara Perdata Nomor 77/Pdt.P/2020/PN Jkt.Pst.

Kasus Perkara Perdata Nomor 70/Pdt.G/2023/PN Sda.

Kasus Perkara Perdata Nomor 943/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Sby

Downloads

Published

2025-03-06

How to Cite

Wiwin Nurwianti, Rielly Lontoh, & Amelia Nur Widyanti. (2025). TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS TERKAIT MINUTA AKTA YANG HILANG DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG JABATAN NOTARIS. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 4(10), 7515–7524. Retrieved from https://www.bajangjournal.com/index.php/JIRK/article/view/9858

Issue

Section

Articles