KLARIFIKASI DALAM MENENTUKAN PESERTA PEMILIH UNTUK MEMBANTU PETUGAS PANTARLIH DALAM MENENTUKAN HAK PEMILIH DALM PEMILU 2024

Edy Widodo

Authors

Edy Widodo Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Keywords:

PKM, citizen data, KTP and Family Card

Abstract

In the current digital era, the general public does not yet understand the term digitization, therefore the government, in seeking correct and valid data, collects citizen data according to KTPs and residences manually. Then valid data will later be used as a potential voter in the 2024 PEMILI. Therefore the government formed a committee to record all local residents according to their KTPs and residences called PANTARLIH officers (Voters Data Updating Officers) who are the spearhead of the KPU in updating and registering voters. The data collection includes age, having an ID card, family card, all of this is recorded according to the local address, so that the voters' data will be truly local residents. The results of this data will become valid voter data in the 2024 election era.

References

Aspinal,E., & Sukmajati, M. (2015). Politik Uang di Indonesia: Patronase dan Klientelisme pada Pemilu Legislatif 2014. Yogyakarta:

Polgov.

Aspinall, E. (2014). When Brokers Betray: Clientelism, Social Networks, and Electoral Politics in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, (April 2015), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2014.960706

Berenschot, W., & Aspinall, E. (2020). How Clientelism Varies: Comparing Patronage Democracies. Democratization, 27(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1645129

Bingham Powell, G., & Whitten, G. D. (1993). Midwest Political Science Association Wiley A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context Author. Source: American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 391–414.

Biswas, F. (2022). Electoral patterns and voting behavior of Bihar in Assembly elections from 2010 to 2020: a spatial analysis. GeoJournal, (April). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10627-2

Boas, T. C. (2015). Voting for Democracy: Campaign Effects in Chile’s Democratic Transition. Latin American Politics and Society, 57(2), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2015.00267.x

Bornschier, S., Häusermann, S., Zollinger, D., & Colombo, C. (2021). How “Us” and “Them” Relates to Voting Behavior—Social Structure, Social Identities, and Electoral Choice. In Comparative Political Studies(Vol. 54). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414021997504

DeCotiis, T. A., & LeLouarn, J. Y. (1981). A Predictive Study of Voting Behavior in a Representation Election Using Union Instrumentality and Work Perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(81)90041-6

Duch, R. M., & Stevenson, R. (2005). Context and the Economic Vote: A Multilevel Analysis. Political Analysis, 13(4), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpi028

Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368

Fong, B. (2017). In-between Liberal Authoritarianism and Electoral Authoritarianism: Hong Kong’s Democratization Under Chinese Sovereignty, 1997–2016. Democratization, 24(4), 724–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2016.1232249

Jasiewicz, K. (2009). “The past is never dead”: Identity, class, and voting behavior in contemporary poland. East European Politics and Societies, 23(4), 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325409342114

Jati, W. R. (2022a). Comparative Analysis of Clientelistic Democracy in India and Indonesia: Outcomes and Challenges. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 7(1).

Jati, W. R. (2022b). Polarization of Indonesian Society during 2014-2020: Causes and Its Impacts toward Democracy. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 26(2), 152–167.

Kusnandar, V. B. (2022). Tingkat Partisipasi Pemilih pada Pemilu Legistatif 1955-2019. Retrieved July 11, 2022, from Data Boks Katadata website: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/06/21/ini-tingkat-partisipasi-pemilih-pada-pemilu-legistatif-1955-2019

Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9

Lembaga Survei Indonesia. (2019). Laporan Survei Post Election 2019. Jakarta.

Loew, N., & Faas, T. (2019). Between Thin-and Host-ideologies: How Populist Attitudes Interact with Policy Preferences in Shaping Voting Behaviour. Representation, 55(4), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2019.1643772

McAllister, I., Sheppard, J., & Bean, C. (2015). Valence and spatial explanations for voting in the 2013 Australian election. Australian Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 330–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2015.1005005

McKenzie-Mohr, D., & Schultz, P. W. (2014). Choosing Effective Behavior Change Tools. Social Marketing Quarterly, 20(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500413519257

Mietzner, M. (2020). Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization, 27(6), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1704266

Muhtadi, B. (2018). Komoditas Demokrasi: Efek Sistem Pemilu terhadap Maraknya Jual Beli Suara. In Pembiayaan Pemilu di Indonesia(pp. 95–117). Jakarta: Bawaslu RI.

Mutz, D. C. (2013). The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088437

Pahlevi, M. E. T., Khalyubi, W., & Khatami, M. I. (2021). Persepsi Pemilih Milenial Dalam Pemilu Serentak 2019 di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu, 2(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v2i2.11

Pastor, R. A. (1999). The role of electoral administration in democratic transitions: Implications for policy and research. Democratization, 6(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510349908403630

Pusat Penelitian Politik -LIPI. (2014). Laporan Akhir Survei Nasional 2014: Partisipasi Politik dan Partisipasi Pemilih. Jakarta.

Raymond, C. D., & Worth, R. M. (2017). Explaining voting behaviour on free votes: Solely a matter of preference? British Politics, 12(4), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-016-0023-7

Rohendi, R., & Muzzamil, F. (2021). Tipologi Pemilih Pemula pada Pilkada Jabar 2018: Studi tentang Tipe Pemilih dari Kalangan Remaja di Kabupaten Purwakarta. Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu, 4(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v4i1.46

Rumah Pemilu. (2014). Money Politic Hantui Pileg. Retrieved July 24, 2022, from Rumah Pemilu website: http://www.pemilu.com/berita/2014/03/money-politics-hantui-pileg-2014